Pitney Bowes
Innovation

Every connection is a new opportunity™

Innovation Connections Blog

McLuhan, Print Media, and User Experiences

Posted by Tom Foth on May 26, 2010 in Innovation

In a recent blog post, Michael Josefowicz of the Digital Nirvana blog (http://bit.ly/bL71sc) talks about how the new internet landscape changes the role of printers in our world. Mr. Josefowicz  observes “What McCluhan attests to is that, when a disruptive technology (such as print in the 15th century, electronic communication today), manifests itself in a way that changes mankind’s sense ratios. Mankind itself is changed forever. When any one sense or bodily or mental function is externalized in technological form, societies change…

“Printing’s number one challenge is to determine where it fits into this new reality.”

I fully agree with Mr. Josefowicz assertion and believe that we can return to McLuhan for the answer: “the medium is the message.”

Over the years, Pitney Bowes’ Advanced Concepts and Technology research group has studied the uses of paper in today’s rapidly moving world.  In that research, we recognize “the affordances of paper” such as not requiring technology to retrieve data from it, being an enabling substrate for very inexpensive and portable data displays (which is really what paper is), and allowing for relatively easy annotation.  As pointed out by Daniel Goleman and Gregory Norris in their New York Times op-chart piece “How Green Is My iPad?” (http://nyti.ms/bho3NZ), paper is “greener” than eBooks depending on the volume of paper.

We also recognize where paper falls short.  It is a static representation of information.  It is not independently interactive.  Annotations are difficult to capture. It consumes space.

Just as radio was not silenced with the advent of television, paper will not be completely eclipsed by the internet.  People seldom sit down and listen to radio like they did before television: for all purposes, radio has become the means to disseminating information and entertainment to people on the go.

So what does paper and printing become?  If we are to follow McLuhan and past examples, paper and printing will morph into serving specific information dissemination needs based on its unique properties.

This new direction begs the question “what is a great print user experience?”  Specifically, how might a printed document satisfy a user’s needs like no other media can?  Paper is rich attributes unlike any other media, attributes that create opportunities for well designed user experiences.  Carefully using those attributes in a contextually appropriate manner will better serve paper becoming the message.

One area for creating new print user experiences that has not been fully exploited is the tactual nature of paper.  Occasionally we see careful selection of paper for it tactual sensation in some formal correspondence, greeting cards, high end catalogs, and some advertisements.  But paper’s tactual sensation is not limited to the substrate.  When is the last time you’ve encountered an embossed document other than in a legal setting? With the world slowing moving to 3D, doesn’t it make sense that we should see more pop-up advertisements?

When we talk of making printed documents more interactive, we look back at the limited success in linking print to the internet. Past experiments include Digimarc’s watermark, the CueCat, Xerox’s glyphs, and recently QR codes and Microsoft’s Tag.  Perhaps the ubiquity of cellphone cameras will finally allow that form of interactivity take off.  In addition, there have been some interesting experiments in augmented reality with paper as the starting point.

I only offer these two as brief examples of the attributes of paper to be exploited.  The changing nature of the world and paper’s place in it cries out to innovators.

In support of Mr. Josefowicz, I agree that those the produce printed documents for others, printers, (so as not to confuse the term with the device), need bring value to their customers beyond simply putting ink on paper.  I believe that value may principally lie in co-designing, with their customers, incredible new print user experiences.

I’d love to hear from you a print user experience you’ve had that was memorable.

(3)
Loading ... Loading ...

Tags: , ,

4 Responses to “McLuhan, Print Media, and User Experiences”

  1. Michael Josefowicz

    27. May, 2010

    Thanks for taking the time to read the post and taking it as a jumping off point.

    In addition to the points you raise, I think it’s worth considering what Print does better than the web. The way I see it Print is optimized for discover while the web is optimized for search.

    Consider that we live in a too fast moving world of information overload. The very fact that Print does not demand interaction is a feature, not a bug.

    Is it easier to search through Craig’s list or scan a printed list of classified ads. It’s an under appreciated fact that shoppers have been doing quite well, even in the face of the competition from the web.

    Consider further that the most effective way to “learn” is by the time tested practice of compare and contrast. My assertion is that compare and contrast is much easier in print than on a screen. It’s interesting that in a number of surveys, college students prefer the school newspaper in Print as opposed to online.

    From the user experience it makes all the sense in the world. You pick up the paper, put it in your back pocket, glance through it while waiting for a friend or your cup of coffee. You can discover something entertaining or interesting effortlessly.

    I could go on, but I’ll stop for now. The important point I would like to make is that if the industry were a bit less defensive and looked more closely at what it precisely means that the “Medium is the Message” it would be much easier to invent new print centric experiences that fills the whole left by the internet, social media and the buzz du jour.

  2. Tom Foth

    27. May, 2010

    Michael,

    I appreciate your points!

    I especially like your comment “The very fact that Print does not demand interaction is a feature, not a bug.”

    To your point: there are times when messages purposefully provoke interactions… but not ALL messages do.

    It is interesting how everyone finds tools useful in there own way: I’d prefer to search craigslist on line than read the want ads on paper. I agree with you that comparing and contrasting two documents is often easier on paper.

  3. Michael Josefowicz

    27. May, 2010

    Another thing to consider is that stress created by being bombarded by information that is asking for an exchange. I think it misses the point that most people, most of the time just want a little peace and quiet.

    Print sits peacefully and quietly until that instant when a person is ready to receive. Whether it’s a quick glance between watching the tube or a diverting read on the train to kill a little time.

    It should also be noted that the amount of data a human can ingest visually is orders of magnitude greater that what can be presented on a small screen.

    Another huge advantage of print – I’m specifically including, signage and packaging – is that it’s much easier to perceive patterns when they are sitting still.

  4. Tom Foth

    01. Jun, 2010

    More discussion on this topic can be found at DocuMentor’s blog at ZDNet: http://www.zdnet.com/blog/doc/physical-mail-still-preferred-by-many/1367

Post a Comment

Guidelines for Comments:The "Innovation Connections Blog" is hosted by Pitney Bowes Inc. By using this Blog you agree that you are solely responsible for any comment you post to the Blog and you agree to abide and be bound by the Pitney Bowes TERMS OF USE.

Please stay on topic. We may redirect certain submissions if they are better handled through another channel such as customer service. With regard to the content of any submissions you make through this Blog, you agree to remain solely responsible and agree to not submit materials that are unlawful, defamatory, abusive or obscene. You also agree that you will not submit anything to this Blog that violates any right of a third party, including copyright, trademark, privacy or other personal or proprietary rights.

Pitney Bowes reserves the right to terminate your ability to use and/or submit posts to this Blog. Pitney Bowes may not review all postings and is not responsible for anything posted on this Blog. Pitney Bowes nevertheless retains the right to not post, edit a posting and to remove any postings in its sole and absolute discretion.

*Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.