Technology Connections

Fixing Health Care with Technology

Posted by Don Peppers on July 27, 2009 in Fortune Brainstorm: Tech

Fixing Health Care with Technology

There was a fascinating breakfast session on Friday at Brainstorm: Tech.  Maybe the most interesting session that I attended at this whole three-day event this year.  There were three main presenters, from Cisco, Athena Health Systems, and mPedigree.  The mPedigree guy, Bright Simons (pronounced “Simmons”), developed a technology and launched a company to help consumers in Africa verify the authenticity of the drug products they buy at pharmacies, using mobile phones.

Apparently a large percentage of products shipped into Africa for retail sale, especially from China, are fake.  The problem we hear most about has to do with fake Gucci bags and Rolex watches, maybe, but a more dangerous and difficult issue is fake pharmaceutical products.  Bright said in some categories as many as 40% of the products imported are simply fraudulent, and in the pharma category this creates not just an economic problem but a serious health risk, as well. 

However, one thing almost all Africans know how to do is top up their cell phones.  Mobile phones have a 40% penetration rate in Africa, and 80% of people at least have access to a mobile phone, even if it isn’t their own personal device.  To top up a phone, the user will buy a top-up card in a retail outlet, scratch off the number on the card, and text it in, at which point the operator extends his time on the phone. 

So mPedigree is working with African governments to ensure that drug products come with item-by-item authentication numbers.  You buy a product at the pharmacy, open it, text in the enclosed number, and you get a message back confirming that the product is genuine, and not a fake.  It’s a smart system. 

But there are lots of applications for this kind of connectivity in US healthcare, also, as Jonathan Bush pointed out, from Athena Health.  His is a public company with about $1 billion in market cap, and their main business is processing claims for doctors to be paid by insurance companies.  Jonathan said their company actually has data to show that more than 50% of doctors’ orders disappear and aren’t carried out – whether it’s an order for a blood test or an x-ray, or an order for a prescription to be filled and the drug taken by a patient.  This is an astounding figure, but he assured us it was true – and they didn’t comb through their data to try to produce this figure, it just dropped out of the other analysis of claims data they were doing.  But, said Jonathan, cell phones could easily be used to report prescription compliance and other things to help ensure that doctors’ orders were fulfilled. 

Pitney Bowes’ Jim Euchner was at the table for this event with us, and he said Pitney Bowes has a strong product offering in the medical compliance arena, and that the problem wasn’t always just oversight or forgetfulness.  Sometimes a drug has unpleasant side effects, or a person simply doesn’t want medicine in his body – there are all sorts of social factors that are at work in non-compliance. 

And Cisco’s Kaveh Safavi, VP of the company’s healthcare practice, finished our session with some truly interesting findings from their company.  For instance, 1% of health care claimants are responsible for 29% of claims, while the bottom 60% do only 1% of the claims, and 80% of employees will NEVER incur $8,000 in healthcare costs in a single year, which is what the average annual insurance premium is.  Kaveh said that 86% of all national healthcare expenditures go through third parties, as well, and this creates a tremendous problem in terms of the dissociation of payment from treatment.  We all want our healthcare costs to be paid, but “insurance” is what we should buy to protect against catastrophic losses, while instead many consumers have first-dollar coverage for everything, either because their companies provide it or because they buy added coverage to provide it for themselves. Either way, they have very little knowledge of the actual cost of the medical procedures they get, and not much interest in the subject, either.

Medicare, for instance, is a classic case of very poor utilization of resources.  Athena Health’s Bush said Medicare is without a doubt the single worst case of poor healthcare utilization management in the whole world, bar none.  At this point, another member of the audience (not identified in this post for obvious reasons) said that her retired father, who is perfectly healthy, is on Medicare, and he goes in for an MRI every month or two, just because he can.  He has no idea what it costs, but it costs him zero, because he has first-dollar coverage (apparently he has a supplement to Medicare that provides this).  So he just wants to make sure he doesn’t get sick!  Needless to say, MRIs are enormously expensive, but since he doesn’t pay any share of this expense, he has absolutely zero interest in reducing his usage.  (It should be no surprise that US healthcare costs are soaring out of control, and no one seems able to fix it.) 

At the end, our moderator asked the panel to tell us the one thing they would tell Washington, if they had a chance, in order to deal with healthcare.  Other than ensuring that patients get better connected to the actual costs themselves, so that they at least have some “skin in the game,” the most interesting suggestion came from Jonathan Bush, who suggested that deregulating enough to allow individual entrepreneurs to take charge of particular types of medical treatments would probably be the best course.  Doctors and insurance companies own the whole show right now, and the only alternative being considered is whether to give some of this responsibility to the government, which would probably be even more disastrous.  Bush said we really ought to let some creativity flourish in the nooks and crannies.  To take a simple example, he said x-rays could almost certainly be delivered at a small fraction of their current cost, if there were just a bit of entrepreneurial energy allowed to be injected into the process.

(1)
Loading ... Loading ...

Tags: ,

2 Responses to “Fixing Health Care with Technology”

  1. Narasimha Varma Nadimpally

    20. Aug, 2009

    I think we need to attack the root cause of the costs involved not just see other alternatives. I am all for limiting and capping the medical malpractice suits plus guidelines for any testing like we get anuual physical exams we dont get it every month simple things should show a lot of improvement in health care costs but the question is who will support it when so much scare tactics are being thrown to public!!!!

  2. Victoria Cashion

    16. Oct, 2009

    Most private insurance companies address the dollar-leaks, and they typically take big measures to fix the leaks -especially if suspected as fraud. In most cases, they understand the benefits of technology change, and where the change works best in fixing leaks and reaching ROI. They make technology decisions carefully in expectation of the decision remaining in place for a number of years and the fallout of their names attached to a failed decision. The private insurance companies answer to stockholders and those questions end careers.

    As the ’stockholders’ of the government insurance companies (both state and national), we remain in the dark as to how the systems work and why excess money pays for unnessary and over inflated materials, procedures, etc. It appauls us, but of whom do we ask questions?

    We know better auditing tools exists for trapping fraud – we sell those solutions to business that must show justification for every dollar spent. As our stock (or taxes) continues to rise in the government programs, we must continue to work on encouranging technology changes to stop the bleeding in these programs.

    Give technology a chance!

Post a Comment

Guidelines for Comments:The Connection Center™ "Blog" is hosted by Pitney Bowes Inc. By using this Blog you agree that you are solely responsible for any comment you post to the Blog and you agree to abide and be bound by the Pitney Bowes TERMS OF USE.

Please stay on topic. We may redirect certain submissions if they are better handled through another channel such as customer service. With regard to the content of any submissions you make through this Blog, you agree to remain solely responsible and agree to not submit materials that are unlawful, defamatory, abusive or obscene. You also agree that you will not submit anything to this Blog that violates any right of a third party, including copyright, trademark, privacy or other personal or proprietary rights.

Pitney Bowes reserves the right to terminate your ability to use and/or submit posts to this Blog. Pitney Bowes may not review all postings and is not responsible for anything posted on this Blog. Pitney Bowes nevertheless retains the right to not post, edit a posting and to remove any postings in its sole and absolute discretion.

*Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.

 

© 2009 Pitney Bowes

Privacy Policy Legal